Rubric+Rough+Drafts


 * Below are the rough drafts for the rubrics.**

prepared and has obviously rehearsed. All parts of their presentation are rehearsed, and each group member knows what part of the presentation they will discuss. || Student seems pretty prepared. Rehearsals of the introduction, body, and conclusion are apparent. There are a few occasions (three or less) where group members do not know who is discussing what part of their project. || The student is somewhat prepared, introductions and conclusions are rehearsed, but rehearsal of the body is not apparent. The group members consistently do not know who will discuss what parts of their presentation. || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">Student does not seem at all <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">prepared to present. There is <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">little to no evidence that the <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">individual members rehearsed their <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">parts, and the group shows no <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">knowledge of who will be <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">presenting what part of their project. || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">points of text, two primary documents, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">two secondary sources, three pictures, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">three frames, and one movie in their Prezi. || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">The group failed to meet <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">the minimum requirement of one <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">piece of content. They failed to gather <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">twelve points of text, two primary <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">documents, two secondary sources, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">three pictures, three frames, or one movie. || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">The group failed to meet the <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">minimum requirement of two pieces of <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">content. They failed to gather twelve <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">points of text, two primary documents, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">two secondary sources, three pictures, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">three frames, or one movie. || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">The group failed to meet the minimum <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">requirement of three or more pieces of content. <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">They failed to gather twelve points of text, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">two primary documents, two secondary <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">sources, three pictures, three frames, or one movie. || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">equally to the project. The group members <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">were respectful of each other, and followed <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">all directions the assignment entailed. || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">Though all group members <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">contributed equally, a lack of <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">respect towards other members may <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">have occurred during group work. <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">The group members followed all <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">directions the assignment entailed. || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">Though all group members contributed <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">equally to the project, the group members <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">were not respectful towards each other <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">during group work, and they failed to <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">follow all directions that the assignment entailed. || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">Group members failed to <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">contribute equally to the project, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">they were not respectful towards <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">each other during group work, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">and they failed to follow all <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">directions that the assignment entailed. || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">They were enthusiastic, included <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">transitions from topic to topic, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">and used their knowledge of <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">content to form a persuasive <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">argument that strengthened their side, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">while also weakening opposing arguments. || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">The group gave an appropriate <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">presentation. They were enthusiastic, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">but did not provide transitions from <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">topic to topic. Their knowledge of <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">content was used to form a persuasive <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">argument that strengthened their side, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">but did not weaken opposing arguments. || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">The group presentation could have <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">been better. The group was not <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">enthusiastic, and did not provide <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">transitions from topic to topic. <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">Though their knowledge of content <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">helped in forming a persuasive <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">argument to strengthen their side, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">they did not attempt to weaken the <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">arguments of opposing sides. || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">The group was not enthusiastic, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">did not include any transitions from <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">topic to topic, and did not utilize their <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">knowledge of content to create a <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">persuasive argument to support their side, <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">and weaken the arguments of opposing sides. ||
 * Screencast Rubric**
 * Category || 4 || 3 || 2 || 1 ||
 * Preparedness || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">Student is completely
 * Content || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">The group included at least twelve
 * Collaboration with Peers || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">All group members contributed
 * Presentation Skills || <span style="font-family: Times,serif; font-size: 13.3333px;">The group gave a superb presentation.


 * Here is the first draft of the rubric for the Discussion Board. Since it is a Spanish class, students will be graded on content as well as grammar and spelling. They should take time on the post to proofread and make sure it is their best work.**


 * <span style="display: block; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; text-align: center;">CATEGORY || **<span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">4 ** || **<span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">3 ** || **<span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">2 ** || **<span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">1 ** ||
 * **<span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">Content ** || <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">The discussion addresses and thoroughly answers each of the 3 questions posed in at least 200 words. || <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">The discussion answers all 3 questions but is too short to thoroughly answer and does not meet the 200 word count. || <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">The discussion post only answers 2 out of the 3 questions and/or does not meet the required length. || <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">The discussion post addresses only 1 of the questions posed and/or does not meet the required length. ||
 * **<span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">Ideas ** || <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">Ideas were expressed in a clear and organized fashion. It was easy to follow the discussion post. The topic of immigration was analyzed and the student applied the immigration topic to his/her personal life || <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">Ideas were expressed in a pretty clear manner, but the organization could have been better. For example, paragraphs were not separated. Student either did not analyze immigration and its importance or apply it to his/her personal life. || <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">Ideas were somewhat organized, but were not very clear. It took more than one reading to figure out the author\'s stance on immigration. There was neither application nor analysis of immigration. || <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">The discussion seems to be a collection of unrelated sentences. It was very difficult to figure out what the author\'s thoughts on immigration were. There was neither application nor analysis of immigration. ||
 * **<span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">Grammar & spelling (conventions) ** || <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling. || <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar and/or spelling. || <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar and/or spelling || <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar and/or spelling. ||


 * Here is the update with four rows of grading areas.**
 * CATEGORY || 4 || 3 || 2 || 1 ||
 * Content || The discussion addresses and thoroughly answers each of the 3 questions posed by providing at least 3 details of supporting evidence/arguments. || The discussion answers all 3 questions but there are only 1-2 details of supporting evidence provided. || The discussion post only answers 2 out of the 3 questions and/or does not provide support/evidence. || The discussion post addresses only 1 of the questions posed and/or does not provide evidence/support. ||
 * Ideas || Ideas were expressed in a clear and organized fashion. It was easy to follow the discussion post. || Ideas were expressed in a pretty clear manner, but the organization could have been better. For example, paragraphs were not separated. || Ideas were somewhat organized, but were not very clear. It took more than one reading to figure out the author\'s stance on immigration. || The discussion seems to be a collection of unrelated sentences. It was very difficult to figure out what the the author\'s thoughts on immigration were. ||
 * Grammar & spelling (conventions) || Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling. || Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar and/or spelling. || Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar and/or spelling || Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar and/or spelling. ||
 * Length || The blog is 200 or more words. || The post is slightly under the 200 word mark. || The post is significantly shorter than 200 words, but it does not take away from the content. || The post has less than 100 words which does not lead to demonstration of student comprehension of topic. ||